diff --git a/content/posts/thought-embedding-space/index.md b/content/posts/thought-embedding-space/index.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4aabd15
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/posts/thought-embedding-space/index.md
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+---
+title: "Modeling Thought"
+date: 2025-01-04T23:24:13Z
+draft: false
+---
+
+I have played with the concept of how to model my own thought for a long time.
+Being that thought is a pretty complex yet predictable process, I have thought about
+what analogies or models I can use to better understand my own way of thinking, and
+why I do certain things.
+
+My working model I have developed thus far (based on nothing but vibes) is
+linear algebra based. I believe this comes from both my CS/Math background causing
+a bias, as well as a bias from learning about how transformers model internal state.
+
+So in this quick writeup, I would like to try and give a quick introduction to
+the concept I have, and over time I will develop it with some of the derivations
+I have found that come as a consequence.
+
+#### Defining Thought
+
+To begin, let me define what I mean when I say a *thought* or an *idea*.
+
+> Thought
+>
+> Any single concept or abstract idea at a single point in time that can be 
+> held inside of one's mind.
+> 
+> Also see *Atomic Thoughts* as used in zettlekastens
+
+Cool. What does this actually mean?
+
+Your mind is almost always experiencing a thought, 
+or sometimes it may feel as though there are several thoughts at once.
+You can think of this as a function of time and some other external stimuli. 
+Lets call
+this function \(M\). Let \(t\) be time and \(e\) be some other 
+state ocurring at this time.
+
+$$
+M(t, e)
+$$
+
+When I say a *thought* or *idea* I mean a single output from \(M\).
+
+#### Modeling an Individual Thought
+
+A single thought is a very complex thing! It has some general idea of "closeness"
+to other thoughts, as well as different "directions" that it can move in. These
+directions are things like how much of a certain adjative a thought containts, 
+for example sentiment or much more complex adjatives like how much a thought
+relates to World War 2. These we can think of as "dimensions".
+
+This is basically how embedding spaces work in language modeling.
+They are modeled as vectors, and I feel that this is a very natural analog to apply
+to thoughts as well. 
+
+We leave the paramaters of these vectors pretty abstract for now. They are \(d\)
+dimenions (presumably \(d\) is rather large) and each thought vector \(\boldsymbol{T}\) is created as a result of some paramaters to \(M\).
+
+$$
+\forall t \ \forall e \ \exists \ \boldsymbol{T} \rightarrow \boldsymbol{T} = M(t, e)
+$$
+
+Also note that  \(\boldsymbol{e}\) is itself a vector.
+
+Thoughts can be checked how similar they are by checking the dot product, which
+encodes the "closeness" we percieve in thoughts. Thoughts An amount of suprise
+can be found by how small the dot product is between the current thought,
+and the next thought.
+
+Next, we will investigate how this model impacts modeling creativity.
+
diff --git a/layouts/partials/math.html b/layouts/partials/math.html
index 1653e6c..9323209 100644
--- a/layouts/partials/math.html
+++ b/layouts/partials/math.html
@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
       displayMath: [['\\[', '\\]'], ['$$', '$$']],  // block
       inlineMath: [['\\(', '\\)']]                  // inline
     },
+    macros: {
+      vect: ["\\boldsymbol{#1}", 1]
+    },
     chtml: {
       scale: 1.2
     }