32 lines
1010 B
Plaintext
32 lines
1010 B
Plaintext
|
3-25-20
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
NOAA-19 (137.1Mhz)
|
||
|
|
DIR N
|
||
|
|
MEL 84E
|
||
|
|
LONG 81 W
|
||
|
|
Appear at: 18:22:43
|
||
|
|
UTC Time: 22:22:43
|
||
|
|
Duration: 15:41
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Antenna Direction: North (V pole facing)
|
||
|
|
Antenna Size: 53cm each
|
||
|
|
Antenna Type: Dipole
|
||
|
|
Height: 144cm
|
||
|
|
Angle: 120
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Tuned in at: 137.1mhz
|
||
|
|
bandwidth: 40.5khz
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
The satilite, acording to the tracker, will be flying directly overheard, but for this run the antenna will
|
||
|
|
always be north. I'm gonna do this for consistency
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Post:
|
||
|
|
All I got was just static. there was a consistent, yet small signal at exactly 138mhz, but i dont think it was
|
||
|
|
noaa, as dopler shift wouldnt do it that much. the azimuth changed dramatically thorughout, so it could just be
|
||
|
|
that it was too far off, directionally
|
||
|
|
it also appeared that there was ALOT of noise going on, so much that it seemed impossible the satilite was
|
||
|
|
even there.
|
||
|
|
Attached in the folder is 3-25-20-noaa19, showing the difference in signal strength on the waterfall in the
|
||
|
|
137 neighborhood, along with a recording and image
|